The Profile Of Secondary School Students’ Written Mathematical Communication Through Problem Solving Assessment Viewed From Differences In Mathematical Ability

Authors

  • Muhammad Rizal Usman Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Andi Husniati Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v10i1.729

Keywords:

Written Mathematical Communication, Mathematical Ability, Problem Solving

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine problem-solving assessments to measure the profile of students' written mathematical communication skills across low, medium, and high ability levels. The problem-solving assessment used includes a problem-solving test and an interview guide. This study is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects consist of three students: one with low mathematical ability, one with medium mathematical ability, and one with high mathematical ability. High-ability students meet four indicators of written mathematical communication skills, which include writing down the known information and questions from the given problem and sketching a diagram, understanding mathematical ideas in planning and formulating rules or presenting formulas, interpreting information in carrying out the problem-solving plan, and reviewing/checking the correctness of the answers/conclusions. Medium-ability students meet one indicator of written mathematical communication skills, which is understanding mathematical ideas to plan and formulate rules or present formulas. Low-ability students do not meet any of the indicators of written mathematical communication skills

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andi Husniati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Pendidikan Matematika

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Usman, M. R., & Husniati, A. (2025). The Profile Of Secondary School Students’ Written Mathematical Communication Through Problem Solving Assessment Viewed From Differences In Mathematical Ability. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v10i1.729